4.5 Article

Systematic evaluation of sample preparation strategy for GC-MS-based plasma metabolomics and its application in osteoarthritis

期刊

ANALYTICAL BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 621, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2021.114153

关键词

Sample preparation; Metabolomics; Gas chromatography mass spectrometry; Biomarker; Osteoarthritis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The all-in-one sample preparation method MeOH-MTBE-H2O (1:5:1.5, v/v/v) was identified as the optimal extraction method for plasma metabolomics. In the study of osteoarthritis (OA), a panel of biomarkers including cholesterol, lactic acid, stearic acid, alpha-tocopherol, and oxalic acid showed potential as diagnostic biomarkers for distinguishing OA patients from healthy controls.
Sample preparation plays a crucial part in plasma metabolomics. In order to obtain an optimal sample extraction method for gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS)-based plasma metabolomics, five different extraction strategies including protein precipitation, liquid-liquid extraction and solid-phase extraction were evaluated systematically for both plasma untargeted- and targeted-metabolomics. The comprehensive evaluation revealed that the all-in-one sample preparation method, MeOH-MTBE-H2O (1:5:1.5, v/v/v), was the optimal extraction method for both untargeted- and targeted-metabolomics. Next, the optimal sample preparation protocol was applied in plasma metabolomics of osteoarthritis (OA). A panel containing cholesterol, lactic acid, stearic acid, alpha-tocopherol and oxalic acid was selected as candidate biomarker to distinguish OA patients from healthy controls (HC) based on the support vector machine (SVM) classification model. The discriminating capability of the candidate biomarker panel was further validated successfully with logistic regression and principal components analysis (PCA) analysis. Therefore, the panel could potentially act as diagnostic biomarker for osteoarthritis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据