4.7 Article

Molecularly imprinted fluoroprobes doped with Ag nanoparticles for highly selective detection of oxytetracycline in real samples

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 1161, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2021.338326

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymer; Oxytetracycline; Fluorescence detection; Rapid analysis; Ag nanoparticle

资金

  1. Sigrid Juselius Foundation [28001830k1]
  2. Academy of Finland [328933]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22001162]
  4. Shanghai Sailing Program [20YF1414200]
  5. International Research Project METISLAB
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [328933, 328933] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully prepared a fluoroprobe with Ag-doped MIP nanolayer for highly selective detection of oxytetracycline in real samples, showing great prospects in environmental quality monitoring and food safety tests.
A molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP), which is synthesized by a nanomolding process around a template, has emerged as a promising analytical tool for environmental quality monitoring and food safety test.In this work, a fluoroprobe with Ag-doped MIP nanolayer (16 nm thickness) is successfully prepared for the highly selective detection of oxytetracycline (OTC) in real samples (i.e. Yangtze River water, swine urine). In the MIP nanolayer, two functional monomers (i.e. 4-(2-acrylamidoethylcarbamoyl)-3-fluorophenylboronic acid, methacrylic acid) synergistically constitute the specific recognition sites. Meanwhile, the doped Ag enhances the detection sensitivity (with a detection limit of 5.38 nM) and accelerates the detection rate (within 2.5 min) even in real samples. Therefore, the present study paves the way for the preparation of MIP-based fluoroprobes, showing great prospects in environmental quality and food safety tests. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据