4.5 Article

Antithrombotic regimens and need for critical care interventions among patients with subdural hematomas

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
卷 47, 期 -, 页码 6-12

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.035

关键词

Subdural hematoma; Traumatic brain injury; Neurotrauma; Intracranial hemorrhage

资金

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [T32NS047996-13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Isolated antiplatelet use is not a significant predictor of the need for critical care interventions or poor functional outcomes among noncomatose subdural hematoma (SDH) patients.
Background: Antithrombotic-associated subdural hematomas (SDHs) are increasingly common, and the possibil-ity of clinical deterioration in otherwise stable antithrombotic-associated SDH patients may prompt unnecessary admissions to intensive care units. It is unknown whether all antithrombotic regimens are equally associated with the need for critical care interventions. We sought to compare the frequency of critical care interventions and poor functional outcomes among three cohorts of noncomatose SDH patients: patients on no antithrombotics, patients on anticoagulants, and patients on antiplatelets alone. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study on all noncomatose SDH patients (Glasgow Coma Scale > 12) presenting to an academic health system in 2018. The three groups of patients were compared in terms of clinical course and functional outcome. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine predictors of need for critical care interventions and poor functional outcome at hospital discharge. Results: There were 281 eligible patients presenting with SDHs in 2018, with 126 (45%) patients on no antithrombotics, 106 (38%) patients on antiplatelet medications alone, and 49 (17%) patients on anticoagulants. Significant predictors of critical care interventions were coagulopathy (OR 5.1, P < 0.001), presence of contusions (OR 3, P = 0.007), midline shift (OR 3.4, P = 0.002), and maximum SDH thickness (OR 2.4, P = 0.002). Significant predictors of poor functional outcome were age (OR 1.8, P < 0.001), admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (OR 0.3, P < 0.001), dementia history (OR 4.2, P = 0.001), and coagulopathy (OR 3.5, P = 0.02). Isolated antiplatelet use was not associated with either critical care interventions or functional outcome. Conclusion: Isolated antiplatelet use is not a significant predictor of need for critical care interventions or poor functional outcome among SDH patients and should not be used as a criterion for triage to the intensive care unit. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据