4.6 Article

People and biodiversity in the 21st century This article belongs to Ambio's 50th Anniversary Collection. Theme: Biodiversity conservation

期刊

AMBIO
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 970-975

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-020-01476-9

关键词

Convention on biodiversity; Indigenous people and conservation; Landscape approaches; Post-2020 biodiversity framework

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the past fifty years, Ambio has published papers that align with changing societal perspectives on biodiversity conservation, advocating for greater involvement of local and indigenous peoples and conservation in multi-functional landscapes. The journal emphasizes the need for a stronger scientific basis for conservation and adaptation to diverse societal preferences and changing conditions.
Fifty years have elapsed since the first publication of Ambio. Throughout this period, fundamental changes have occurred in societal attitudes to biodiversity conservation. Ambio has published numerous papers that have aligned with these new approaches. High citations numbers suggest that Ambio papers have had a significant impact on conservation strategies. We review these publications and find that they align well with changed societal perspectives on biodiversity. Ambio papers have called for greater contributions of local and indigenous peoples and for conservation in multi-functional landscapes. The 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity built on these principles. Negotiations are now underway for a post-2020 framework for biodiversity. Ambio papers have argued for a stronger scientific basis for conservation and for the need to adapt to changing conditions and to the rich diversity of societal preferences for conservation. International processes favor simple, generalizable approaches to conservation but we call for recognition of the diversity of ecological and human conditions in which conservation occurs. There is a need to build capacity to support a diversity of conservation approaches that are adapted to changing local conditions and to the priorities of diverse human societies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据