4.7 Article

Plasma p-tau181, p-tau217, and other blood-based Alzheimer's disease biomarkers in a multi-ethnic, community study

期刊

ALZHEIMERS & DEMENTIA
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 1353-1364

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/alz.12301

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; amyloid; blood-based biomarkers; neurofilament light chain; tau

资金

  1. Washington Heights-Inwood Community Aging Project (WHICAP) - National Institute on Aging (NIA) [P01AG07232, RF1AG054023, R01AG037212, R56AG034189, R01AG034189, R01AG054520]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blood-based Alzheimer's disease biomarkers show associations with pathological and clinical diagnoses, and have predictive value for future development of clinical AD, indicating their potential for incorporation into multi-ethnic community studies.
IntroductionBlood-based Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers provide opportunities for community studies and across ethnic groups. We investigated blood biomarker concentrations in the Washington Heights-Inwood Columbia Aging Project (WHICAP), a multi-ethnic community study of aging and dementia. MethodsWe measured plasma amyloid beta (A beta)40, A beta 42, total tau (t-tau), phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181, and p-tau217, and neurofilament light chain (NfL) in 113 autopsied participants (29% with high AD neuropathological changes) and in 300 clinically evaluated individuals (42% with clinical AD). Receiver operating characteristics were used to evaluate each biomarker. We also investigated biomarkers as predictors of incident clinical AD. ResultsP-tau181, p-tau217, and NfL concentrations were elevated in pathologically and clinically diagnosed AD. Decreased A beta 42/A beta 40 ratio and increased p-tau217 and p-tau181 were associated with subsequent AD diagnosis. DiscussionBlood-based AD biomarker concentrations are associated with pathological and clinical diagnoses and can predict future development of clinical AD, providing evidence that they can be incorporated into multi-ethnic, community-based studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据