4.5 Review

Cotton boll distribution: A review

期刊

AGRONOMY JOURNAL
卷 113, 期 2, 页码 956-970

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/agj2.20516

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Cotton Incorporated - Texas State Support Committee

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the environmental factors affecting boll production and distribution, reviews methods of measuring and analyzing boll distribution, and discusses the comparative advantages and drawbacks of these methods. By combining the positive elements in the different studies, significant progress can still be made in the area of boll distribution measurement.
Boll distribution provides an important assessment of the response and adaptation of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) to its environment and is strongly linked to yield and fiber quality and consequently to economic value. Several studies have measured boll distribution through end-of-season field or box mapping to study the spatiotemporal characteristics of bolls at both the plant and field levels, to quantify the effects of stress on cotton maturity and fiber quality, and to estimate yield as a function of the relative partitioning of resources to competing sinks. This paper discusses the environmental factors affecting boll production and distribution, reviews methods of measuring and analyzing boll distribution, and discusses the comparative advantages and drawbacks of these methods. With the advent of advanced imaging technologies, this paper also discusses the potential transition from traditional methods to machine-based boll distribution measurements, the challenges associated with these technologies, and how continuous improvements in the baseline technologies being used in the different methods will translate to improved measurement capacities. Overall, major strides can still be made in the area of boll distribution measurement by combining the positive elements in the different studies described in this review to circumvent each of their respective limitations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据