4.7 Article

Hierarchically porous carbon derived from renewable Chingma Abutilon Seeds for high-energy supercapacitors

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 32, 期 3, 页码 718-727

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2021.01.014

关键词

Biomass; Hierarchically porous structure; Carbon materials; Supercapacitor; High energy density

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province, China [2019-ZD-0293]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the excellent electrochemical performance of biomass-derived porous carbon materials, including high specific capacitance and excellent rate stability, showcasing their potential in energy storage applications.
The cost-effectively biomass-derived porous carbon is highly promising for usage in electrochemical energy storage as the electrode materials. Herein, a series of hierarchically porous carbons with biomass Chingma Abutilon Seeds as the renewable precursor were synthesized via KOH activation and high-temperature carbonization technique. The resulting carbon material possessed an interconnected structure, high specific surface area (120-3566 m(2) g(-1)), hierarchical pores as well as the heteroatom-substituted functional groups. Based on the synergistic effect of the above-mentioned merits, the optimized material exhibited the remarkably electrochemical performance with high specific capacitance (389 F g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1)) and excellent rate stability (72% capacitance retention at 20 A g(-1)) in the three-electrode configuration. More significantly, the symmetric two-electrode device assembled in 6 M KOH delivered a high energy density of 39.2 Wh kg(-1) and excellent chemical stability (90% capacitance retention after 10,000 cycles at 5 A g(-1)). Such prominent results might provide a new perspective on the value-added application of the renewable biomass resources in the electrochemical field. (C) 2021 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据