4.0 Article

BIOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF FENNEL (Ferula communis L. DIFFERENT PARTS THROUGH THEIR ESSENTIAL OILS, FATTY ACIDS AND PHENOLICS

期刊

出版社

UNIV LIFE SCIENCES LUBLIN
DOI: 10.24326/asphc.2021.1.1

关键词

Ferula communis; essential oil; fatty acids; polyphenols; endogenous variability

资金

  1. Tunisian Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to compare the composition of fatty acids, essential oils, and phenolic compounds in different parts of Tunisian Ferula communis. Results showed a high variability in the content of bioactive compounds among the plant parts, with leaves and fruits rich in fatty acids while flowers and stems containing different types of compounds.
The intention of this study was to compare the different parts of Tunisian Ferula communis via their fatty acids, essential oils and phenolic compounds. Results showed that the lipid fraction of fruits and leaves was characterized by the predominance of oleic acid. Erucic and linoleic acids were the most abundant in stems while linoleic and palmitic acids in flowers. F. communis essential oils were defined by four chemotypes, namely isoshyobunone/6-tert-butyl-4-methylcoumarin in stems; alpha-eudesmol/caryophyllene oxide in leaves; caryophyllene/myrcene in flowers and alpha-gurjunene/hexadecanoic acid in fruits. So, oxygenated sesquiterpenes and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons represented the major classes of stem essential oil. Monoterpene hydrocarbons were the predominant classes of leaves and flowers. Fruit essential oil was predominated by sesquiterpene hydrocarbons. Resorcinol and ferulic acid were the main phenolic compounds in flowers but chlorogenic and ferulic acides in leaves. Stems were rich in ferulic acid and quercetin while leaves in coumarin and tannic acid. Besides to the high variability among F. communis parts, this plant contained high amounts of bioactive compounds with various health benefits attributed to their antioxidant potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据