4.5 Article

The validity of the Language Environment Analysis system in two neonatal intensive care units

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 110, 期 7, 页码 2045-2051

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15802

关键词

language acquisition; Language Environment Analysis; neonatal intensive care unit; parental speech; preterm infant

资金

  1. Doctoral Programme in Psychology, Learning and Communication, University of Helsinki
  2. Swedish Cultural Foundation in Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the validity of the LENA system in neonatal intensive care units, finding that the system provided accurate information on adult words, but estimates for child vocalisations were less accurate at this early age.
Aim To evaluate the validity of the Language Environment Analysis (LENA) system's automatic measures in two neonatal intensive care units supporting parent-infant closeness, and in two Finno-Ugric languages: Finnish and Estonian. Methods The sound environment of 70 very preterm infants was recorded for 16 h in the neonatal intensive care units with the LENA system roughly at the gestational age of 32 (+2) weeks. Of these, the recordings of 14 infants (20%, two 5-min samples with a high percentage of speech, totally 140 min) were analysed in detail and in two different ways. Parental closeness diaries were used to document the presence of the parents. Agreements between LENA system and human coder estimates were analysed. Results Findings showed a high variation in agreements. The highest agreements were found in female and adult word counts (r = 0.91 and 0.95). The agreements for child vocalisation count, conversational turns and silence were modest or low (r = -0.03 to 0.64). Conclusion Our study provides novel information on the validity of the LENA system in the neonatal intensive care unit. Findings show that the LENA system provides valid information on adult words, but LENA estimates for child vocalisations were less valid at this early age.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据