4.5 Article

Post-dural puncture headache-a single-centre analysis in paediatric patients with and without SMA

期刊

ACTA PAEDIATRICA
卷 110, 期 6, 页码 1895-1901

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/apa.15799

关键词

headache; lumbar puncture; post‐ dural puncture headache; spinal muscular atrophy

资金

  1. University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that the prevalence of PDPH after therapeutic LPs in SMA patients was significantly lower than in general pediatric patients. The overall prevalence of PDPH in pediatric patients was similar to that reported in larger adult cohorts.
Aim To gather epidemiologic data on post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) after diagnostic or therapeutic lumbar puncture (LP) in children and adolescents with SMA as well as in a cohort of paediatric patients without SMA. Methods We performed a retrospective, single-centre analysis via chart review and questionnaire. Patients were identified using the German procedure classification. Respective charts and SMArtCARE documentation forms (SMA patients) were reviewed concerning documentation of headaches fulfilling criteria of the IHS-classification for PDPH of 2004. Non-SMA patients received additional questionnaires. Results We identified a total of 218 LPs in 95 patients. Of those 141 were performed in 22 patients with known SMA (mean age SMA patients 9.2 years; non-SMA patients 11.4 years). Following chart review, IHS criteria for PDPH were fulfilled in 6.9% of all procedures (3.5% in SMA patients; 13.0% in non-SMA patients; p = 0.008). Data from questionnaires of non-SMA patients confirmed this result (position dependent headache within 72 h after intervention in 13.0% of procedures). Conclusion The prevalence of PDPH after therapeutic LPs in our cohort of SMA patients was significantly lower than after LPs in the general paediatric cohort. Data of this retrospective analysis show a similar overall prevalence of PDPH in paediatric patients as reported in bigger adult cohorts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据