4.4 Article

Microstructure-dependent Band Gaps for Elastic Wave Propagation in a Periodic Microbeam Structure

期刊

ACTA MECHANICA SOLIDA SINICA
卷 34, 期 4, 页码 527-538

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10338-021-00217-z

关键词

Band gaps; Wave propagation; Bernoulli-Euler beam; Strain gradient; Couple stress; Velocity gradient

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12002086, 11872149, 11472079]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2242020R10027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new model has been developed to predict band gaps for flexural elastic wave propagation in periodic microbeam structures, taking into account material parameters, beam thickness, unit cell length, and volume fraction. Numerical results show that band gap frequency range increases with material parameters, and the predicted band gap size is larger than that of the classical model, especially for thin beams. Unit cell length and volume fraction also have significant effects on the band gap.
A new model for producing band gaps for flexural elastic wave propagation in a periodic microbeam structure is developed using an extended transfer matrix method and a non-classical Bernoulli-Euler beam model that incorporates the strain gradient, couple stress and velocity gradient effects. The band gaps predicted by the new model depend on the three microstructure-dependent material parameters of each constituent material, the beam thickness, the unit cell length and the volume fraction. A parametric study is conducted to quantitatively illustrate these factors. The numerical results reveal that the first band gap frequency range increases with the increases of the three microstructure-dependent material parameters, respectively. In addition, the band gap size predicted by the current model is always larger than that predicted by the classical model, and the difference is large for very thin beams. Furthermore, both the unit cell length and volume fraction have significant effects on the band gap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据