4.7 Article

Atomic structure of solute clusters in Al-Zn-Mg alloys

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.116574

关键词

Aluminium alloys; Transmission electron microscopy (TEM); Natural ageing; Atom probe tomography (APT); Density functional theory (DFT)

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway (NFR) [NFR: 247598]
  2. Hydro
  3. Granges
  4. Benteler Automotive Raufoss AS
  5. Steertec Raufoss [NFR: 294933]
  6. 'SumAl' [NFR: 294933]
  7. Neuman Aluminium
  8. NTNU Digital Transformation initiative `Alldesign'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scanning transmission electron microscopy imaging of Al-Zn-Mg alloys at low temperatures has revealed the atomic structures of solute-rich clusters, characterized by a unique unit with high Zn/Mg ratio. The arrangement of these basic units to form larger clusters is described by Frank-Kasper structures, supported by density functional theory calculations, atom probe tomography, and simulated diffraction patterns. These results provide new insight into the early stages of age-hardening in aluminum alloys.
Scanning transmission electron microscopy imaging of Al-Zn-Mg alloys has provided new information on the atomic structures of solute rich clusters forming from a supersaturated solid solution at low temperatures. A unique unit of high Zn/Mg ratio is the fundamental cluster building block. The unit is essentially a partial substitution by Mg and Zn on the cubic aluminium cell and its surrounding truncated cube octahedral shell. A simple set of principles based on Frank-Kasper structures describes how the basic units arrange with respect to each other to form larger clusters. Density functional theory calculations, atom probe tomography and simulated diffraction patterns support the proposed atomic models. The results provide new insight into the very early stages of age-hardening in aluminium alloys. (C) 2020 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据