4.6 Article

Influence of Battery Cell Components and Water on the Thermal and Chemical Stability of LiPF6 Based Lithium Ion Battery Electrolytes

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 1267-1271

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.100

关键词

electrolyte degradation; lithium ion battery electrolyte; NMR spectroscopy; thermal stability

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  2. project Elektrolytlabor4e [03 x 4632]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium ion battery electrolytes based on LiPF6 and organic solvents are known to degrade at elevated temperatures. The degradation reactions can be caused either chemically e.g. by simple contact with battery cell components and/or electrochemically during cycling. This study is focused on thermally induced chemical reactions of the electrolyte with different battery cell components. These reactions are monitored by means of quantitative NMR spectroscopy. The results allow for categorizing the influences of the components according to their reactivity against HF. Inert materials (graphite, carbon black, polyvinylidene difluoride, polyolefinic and ceramic separator) do not show any observable influence on the thermal stability of the electrolyte. If the materials react with HF but the reaction does not form water in significant amounts (Li metal and LiNi1/3Co1/3Mn1/3O2), there is also no influence observable. In contrast to that, materials, which can form water in contact with HF at significant rates (glass fiber separator, Si and LiFePO4), can lead to a slightly increased or even severe electrolyte degradation. However, if the material neutralizes the acid HF (carboxymethyl cellulose), it stabilizes LiPF6 against water sources. Furthermore, the results of this study show that LiPF6 is stable at temperatures up to 80 degrees C, if no water sources are present. This stability is most likely also given for even higher temperatures. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据