4.6 Article

Electrochemically grafted single molecule junctions exploiting a chemical protection strategy

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 220, 期 -, 页码 436-443

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.10.095

关键词

STM; single molecule conductance; diazonium grafting; SHINERS; Raman spectroscopy

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/H035184/1, EP/K007785/1, EP/K007548/1]
  2. European Union (Seventh Framework Programme, Marie Curie Programme) [318990]
  3. ARC [DP140100855]
  4. award of a Future Fellowship [FT120100073]
  5. EPSRC [EP/M029204/1, EP/M029522/1, EP/H035184/1, EP/K007785/1, EP/M005046/1, EP/K007548/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K007785/1, EP/H035184/1, EP/M005046/1, EP/M029522/1, EP/M029204/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diazonium grafted oligo(phenylene ethynylene) (OPE) monolayers suitable for single molecule conductance studies have been prepared. The surface-bound OPE is prepared from the amino tolan, 4-(2-(4-(2-(triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)phenyl)ethynyl)benzamine, which is converted to the diazonium derivative in situ, and subsequently attached to a gold substrate using conventional cathodic electrochemical grafting. Multilayer formation is avoided by the presence of the bulky triisopropylsilyl (TIPS) protected ethynyl group. After removal of the TIPS group by treatment with fluoride, the film, now bearing exposed terminal acetylene moieties, is further functionalised by reaction with 1-iodo-4-acetylthiobenzene using Sonogashira coupling chemistry, to create sites bearing a strongly aurophilic top-contacting group. The success of these surface reactions is confirmed using Raman spectroscopy (gap-mode and SHINERS, employing gold nanoparticles and SiO2 coated gold nanoparticles, respectively). It is shown that such thiolate-modified, diazonium-grafted monolayers are suitable for STM-based molecular junction conductance measurements. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据