4.8 Article

Customized Cellulose Fiber Paper Enabled by an In Situ Growth of Ultralong Hydroxyapatite Nanowires

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 5355-5365

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.0c10903

关键词

cellulose fiber; paper; hydroxyapatite; nanowires; superhydrophobic; photoluminescence

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFA0710303]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52002072, U1905215, 52072076]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellulose fiber paper is a low-cost and sustainable substrate that has attracted increasing interest. Functionalization with ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowires allows for customization of the paper's functions, such as creating a hierarchical structure and enabling specific applications like photoluminescence and superhydrophobicity.
Cellulose fiber (CF) paper is a low-cost, sustainable, and flexible substrate, which has gained increasing interest recently. Before practical usage, the functionalization of the pristine CF paper is indispensable to meet requirements of specific applications. Different from conventional surface modification or physical mixing methods, we report in situ growth of ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowires (HAPNWs) with lengths larger than 10 mu m on the CF paper. HAPNWs are radially aligned on the surface of CFs, creating a micro/nanoscale hierarchical structure. By means of the excellent ion exchange ability of HAP and the hierarchical structure, the functions of the CF paper can be easily customized. As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrate two kinds of functional CF paper: (1) the photoluminescent CF paper by doping Eu3+ and Tb3+ ions into the crystal lattice of HAPNWs and (2) the superhydrophobic CF paper by coating poly(dimethylsiloxane) on the HAPNW hierarchical structure, which can be applied for self-cleaning and oil/water separation. It is expected that an in situ growth of ultralong HAPNWs will provide an instructive guideline for designing a CF paper with specific functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据