4.8 Article

Atomically Dispersed Indium Sites for Selective CO2 Electroreduction to Formic Acid

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 5671-5678

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.1c00858

关键词

carbon dioxide reduction; single-atom catalyst; indium; formate production; renewable energy

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP190100295, LE190100014, LE19 0100021]
  2. ANU Futures Scheme [Q4601024]
  3. ANU Global Research Partnership Scheme [R468504649]
  4. Key Program for International Science and Technology Cooperation Projects of China [2018YFE0124600]
  5. Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel atomically dispersed indium catalyst has been developed for efficiently producing formic acid/formate in aqueous media, outperforming conventional metallic In catalysts. The formation of the intermediate *OCHO on isolated In sites plays a pivotal role in the efficiency of the CO2-to-formate process, with a lower energy barrier compared to metallic In.
An atomically dispersed structure is attractive for electrochemically converting carbon dioxide (CO2) to fuels and feedstock due to its unique properties and activity. Most single-atom electrocatalysts are reported to reduce CO2 to carbon monoxide (CO). Herein, we develop atomically dispersed indium (In) on a nitrogen-doped carbon skeleton (In-N-C) as an efficient catalyst to produce formic acid/formate in aqueous media, reaching a turnover frequency as high as 26771 h(-1) at -0.99 V relative to a reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE). Electrochemical measurements show that trace amounts of In loaded on the carbon matrix significantly improve the electrocatalytic behavior for the CO2 reduction reaction, outperforming conventional metallic In catalysts. Further experiments and density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal that the formation of intermediate *OCHO on isolated In sites plays a pivotal role in the efficiency of the CO2-to-formate process, which has a lower energy barrier than that on metallic In.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据