4.8 Article

Polyhedron and Charge Ordering in Interfacial Reconstruction of a Hexagonal Ferrite/Sapphire Heterostructure

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 11489-11496

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c22078

关键词

interfacial reconstruction; polyhedron ordering; charge ordering; hexagonal ferrite; scanning transmission electron microscopy

资金

  1. Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (Basic Science Center Project of NSFC) [51788104, 51527803, 11834009, 51761135131, 51525102]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2016YFB0700402]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates the crucial role of interfacial reconstruction in modulating the microstructures and properties of heterostructures, revealing the mechanisms through atomic-resolution imaging and spectroscopy. The reported reconstruction implies the importance of polyhedral and electronic flexibility in the formation of reconstructions and offers possibilities for constructing more functional heterostructures in the future.
Interfacial reconstruction, emanating from the symmetry breaking at the interface, plays a key role in modulating the microstructures and properties of heterostructures. The appeal of revealing such a reconstruction resides in the underlying mechanism connected to the function of heterostructures and new insights into designing a new interface device. Here, we demonstrate an interfacial reconstruction in a large lattice-mismatch system, h-LuFeO3/alpha-Al2O3 heterostructure. Combining the atomic-resolution imaging and spectroscopy of scanning transmission electron microscopy, the periodic variation of FeO immediate coordination and charge ordering of iron are revealed, indicating a strong lattice-charge coupling in the reconstruction. Such a reconstruction reported here suggests that polyhedral and electronic flexibility is important for the reconstruction formation and presents possibilities for further construction of more functional heterostructures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据