4.6 Article

Tailoring three dimensional α-MnO2/RuO2 hybrid nanostructure as prospective bifunctional catalyst for Li-O2 batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 212, 期 -, 页码 701-709

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.07.067

关键词

Lithium oxygen battery; electrocatalyst; hybrid materials; three dimensional nanostructures; alpha-MnO2/RuO

资金

  1. Human Resources Development program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant - Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy [20114030200060]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have synthesized three dimensional architectural alpha-MnO2/RuO2 hybrid nanostructures with three different compositions of (75:25), (69:31) and (50:50) by hydrothermal approach and evaluated their bifunctional electrocatalytic activity for Li-O-2 battery applications. The morphology of the alpha-MnO2/RuO2 nanostructures changed from sharp sea urchins to solid nanospheres with increasing RuO2 content in the composition. The variations observed in physical, structural, morphological and electrochemical properties were characterized with respect to the MnO2/RuO2 concentrations by step by step analyses. MnO2 exhibited better ORR catalytic activity, while RuO2 revealed superior OER catalytic activity. Among the concentrations investigated, alpha-MnO2:RuO2 (75:25) exhibited superior catalytic activity for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions in aqueous media. This excellent catalytic activity logically led us to apply it as air-cathode catalyst in Li-O-2 cell, which produced a maximum capacity of >8100 mAhg (1) with high columbic efficiency and cyclability. The superior performance of the hybrid nanostructure is mainly attributed to its structural and compositional design which favors the electrochemical activity. Based on a careful investigation on the structural characterizations, the growth mechanism of the 3D nanostructured alpha-MnO2/RuO2 mixed oxides is discussed in detail. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据