4.8 Article

Electronic Structure of the CdS/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Interface of KF- and RbF-Treated Samples by Kelvin Probe and Photoelectron Yield Spectroscopy

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 6, 页码 7745-7755

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c20976

关键词

chalcopyrites; thin-film solar cells; alkali fluoride postdeposition treatments; interfaces; band diagram; Kelvin probe; photoemission spectroscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that KF-PDT and RbF-PDT have a significant impact on the electronic properties of CIGSe thin films and the CdS/CIGSe interface, with the CIGSe surface band gap depending on the type of postdeposition treatment and a thin layer with a graded band gap found at the CdS/CIGSe interface. K and Rb act as compensating acceptors in the CdS layer.
Ambient-pressure Kelvin probe and photoelectron yield spectroscopy methods were employed to investigate the impact of the KF and RbF postdeposition treatments (KF-PDT, RbF-PDT) on the electronic features of Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 (CIGSe) thin films and the CdS/CIGSe interface in a CdS thickness series that has been sequentially prepared during the chemical bath deposition (CBD) process depending on the deposition time. We observe distinct features correlated to the CBD-CdS growth stages. In particular, we find that after an initial CBD etching stage, the valence band maximum (VBM) of the CIGSe surface is significantly shifted (by 180-620 mV) toward the Fermi level. However, VBM positions at the surface of the CIGSe are still much below the VBM of the CIGSe bulk. The CIGSe surface band gap is found to depend on the type of postdeposition treatment, showing values between 1.46 and 1.58 eV, characteristic for a copperpoor CIGSe surface composition. At the CdS/CIGSe interface, the lowest VBM discontinuity is observed for the RbF-PDT sample. At this interface, a thin layer with a graded band gap is found. We also find that K and Rb act as compensating acceptors in the CdS layer. Detailed energy band diagrams of the CdS/CIGSe heterostructures are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据