4.8 Article

Co2N/Co2Mo3O8 Heterostructure as a Highly Active Electrocatalyst for an Alkaline Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 8337-8343

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c20271

关键词

water splitting; electrocatalyst; alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction; transition metal nitrides; heterostructure

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2016A030312011]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51621001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a facile synthesis method for a novel self-supported Co2N/CoN/Co2Mo3O8 catalyst, which significantly enhances the catalytic performance for the hydrogen evolution reaction by utilizing a heterostructured design with abundant active sites and good electrical conductivity.
The development of earth-abundant electrocatalysts with high intrinsic activity, abundant active sites, and good electrical conductivity is of vital importance for the market penetration of clean energy technologies. We herein report a facile synthesis of a self-supported Co2N/CoN/Co2Mo3O8 heterostructured catalyst on cobalt foam (CF) by a hydrothermal process followed by nitridation treatment. Our first-principles calculations revealed that Co2Mo3O8 and Co2N could work in concert to provide active sites for an alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). The hierarchical and nanoporous architecture of the Co2N/CoN/Co2Mo3O8 catalyst ensured an abundance of accessible active sites. The direct growth of metalloid CoxN nanoparticles on the defective Co2Mo3O8 substrate endowed the catalyst with good electrical conductivity. As a consequence, the Co2N/CoN/Co2Mo3O8/CF catalyst showed extraordinarily high activity and good stability toward the alkaline HER, outperforming most existing non-precious electrocatalysts. In particular, it exhibited a comparable catalytic performance to the commercial Pt/C catalyst at a current density of 100 mA cm(-2).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据