4.5 Article

A feasibility study of an integrated couples-based supportive programme for Chinese couples living with colorectal cancer

期刊

NURSING OPEN
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 920-926

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nop2.700

关键词

blended intervention; cancer; colorectal cancer; couples-based intervention; oncology; spousal caregiver

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773297]
  2. General Project of Wuxi Health Commission [MS201832, MS201916]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to test the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of an integrated approach combining online and in-person delivery to support colorectal cancer patients and their spousal caregivers coping positively with cancer together. The results supported the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention for couples coping with CRC, showing potential efficacy.
Aim: To test the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of using an integrated approach combined online and in-person delivery to support colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their spousal caregivers coping positively with cancer together. Design: A single-arm pre-post-feasibility design was used. Methods: Chinese CRC patient-partner dyads (N = 24) accessed the blended intervention combined online platform and face-to-face sessions for six weeks between October 2019 to January 2020. Feasibility was measured through recruitment and retention and acceptability was examined by intervention engagement and post-treatment programme evaluation. Effect sizes were calculated using the complete data (N = 20 couple dyads) to evaluate preliminary treatment effect. Results: Recruitment (70.6%) and retention rates (83.3%) supported programme feasibility. Participants' positive intervention engagements and evaluations indicated acceptability. The overall small-to-medium improvements in most outcome measures verified preliminary efficacy of the integrated couples-based supportive programme. The findings support its feasible and acceptable for couples coping with CRC and show potential efficacy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据