4.6 Article

Solution Blown Silicon Carbide Porous Nanofiber Membrane as Electrode Materials for Supercapacitors

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 257-265

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.05.003

关键词

silicon carbide; nanofibrous membrane; hierarchical porous; solution blowing; supercapacitors

资金

  1. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAEO1B03]
  2. Innovation Fund for Technology of China [14C26211200298]
  3. Innovation Fund for Technology of Tianjin [14ZXCXGX00776, 14TXGCCX00014]
  4. Research Program of Application Foundation
  5. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) of Ministry of Education of China [IRT13084]
  6. Advanced Technology of Tianjin [13JCZDJC32500]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon carbide materials have attracted much attention in supercapacitor as electrode materials. Solution blowing process is a novel method to fabricate nanofibers with high productivity. In this study, silicon carbide nanofiber membranes (SiC-NFMs) with porous architecture were prepared via solution blowing process and subsequent calcination, which exhibiting good electrochemical performance as electrode materials for supercapacitors. As a simple and efficient nanofiber fabricating method, solution blowing was introduced here to produce as-spun precursor nanofiber membranes which would be pyrolysed to Silicon carbide products. The porous architecture of SiC-NFMs, which was composed of mesopores in each single nanofiber and macropores between nanofibers, led to the excellent electrochemical performance. The results showed that these membranes were of high specific capacitance (similar to 189 F g (1)) and outstanding cycling stability (91.7% retention after 3000 cycles). This solution blowing method would find application to produce SiC-NFMs which can be used as electrode materials for supercapacitors with good performance. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据