4.5 Article

Efficient Electrochemical Recovery of Tellurium from Spent Electrolytes by Cyclone Electrowinning

期刊

JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE METALLURGY
卷 7, 期 1, 页码 27-45

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40831-020-00317-z

关键词

Electrochemical recovery; Tellurium; Spent tellurium electrolytes; Cyclone electrowinning

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52074363]
  2. Hunan Natural Science Foundation [2019JJ20031]
  3. Hunan Key Research and Development Program [2019SK2061]
  4. Qingyuan Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research Team Project [2018001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel process called cyclone electrowinning was developed to recover tellurium from spent tellurium electrolytes. Under optimal conditions, high purity tellurium deposits were obtained with a high current efficiency and tellurium recovery rate, while reducing energy consumption and liquid effluent. The technology shows promise as an alternative method for tellurium recovery.
A novel process for recovery of tellurium (Te) from spent Te electrolytes by cyclone electrowinning was developed. The effects of current density, electrolysis time, flow rate of the electrolyte (FRE), electrolyte temperature and cathode substrates on current efficiency (CE), tellurium recovery, cell voltage, energy consumption (EC), and surface morphology were systematically investigated. 99.90% of purity Te deposits were obtained while 95.61% of CE was achieved under the optimum conditions: electrolysis time of 24 h, current density of 60 A.m(-2), FRE of 300 L.h(-1), temperature of 30 degrees C and cathode substrates of 316L SS. Meanwhile, Te recovery and EC were 82.89% and 1810.58 kWh.t(-1), respectively. Furthermore, as the solution after the electrowinning is recyclable, the consumption of reagents and the liquid effluent are minimized. All the parameters indicate that the cyclone electrowinning technology might serve as a promising alternative for recovering Te from spent Te electrolyte.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据