4.6 Article

Inhibiting the reproduction of SARS-CoV-2 through perturbations in human lung cell metabolic network

期刊

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

LIFE SCIENCE ALLIANCE LLC
DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202000869

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. University of Warwick
  2. Biotechnological and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/T010150/1, BB/S506783/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/S506783/1, BB/T010150/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing genomic and structural information, a biomass function capturing the amino and nucleic acid requirements of SARSCoV-2 was developed and incorporated into a metabolic model of human lung cells. Through metabolic flux balance analysis, host-based metabolic perturbations inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 reproduction were identified.
Viruses rely on their host for reproduction. Here, we made use of genomic and structural information to create a biomass function capturing the amino and nucleic acid requirements of SARSCoV-2. Incorporating this biomass function into a stoichiometric metabolic model of the human lung cell and applying metabolic flux balance analysis, we identified host-based metabolic perturbations inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 reproduction. Our results highlight reactions in the central metabolism, as well as amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis pathways. By incorporating host cellular maintenance into the model based on available protein expression data from human lung cells, we find that only few of these metabolic perturbations are able to selectively inhibit virus reproduction. Some of the catalysing enzymes of such reactions have demonstrated interactions with existing drugs, which can be used for experimental testing of the presented predictions using gene knockouts and RNA interference techniques. In summary, the developed computational approach offers a platform for rapid, experimentally testable generation of drug predictions against existing and emerging viruses based on their biomass requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据