4.6 Article

Fe/Fe3C decorated 3-D porous nitrogen-doped graphene as a cathode material for rechargeable Li-O2 batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 191, 期 -, 页码 733-742

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.01.134

关键词

3-D porous structure; N-doped graphene; Fe/Fe3C; Li-O-2 batteries

资金

  1. Teacher Research Fund of Central South University [2013JSJJ027]
  2. Project of Innovation-driven Plan in Central South University [2015CXS018, 2015CX001]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fe/Fe3C decorated 3-D porous N-doped graphene (F-PNG) is designed and synthesized via a one-step carbonization route. During the process, MIL-100(Fe), a kind of metal organic frameworks (MOFs) plays a structure-directing role. It is found that F-PNG with 3-D porous structure is constituted by N-doped graphene and extremely small Fe/Fe3C particles uniformly distribute on the surface of graphene. This rationally designed F-PNG possesses excellent oxygen reduction reaction and oxygen evolution reaction bifunctional electrocatalytic activity. While the material is explored as a cathode of Li-O-2 batteries, it exhibits excellent electrochemical performances, delivering a discharge voltage platform of similar to 2.91 V and a charge voltage platform of similar to 3.52 V at 0.1 mA cm(-2), showing a good cycle performance and having a discharge capacity of similar to 7150 mAh g(carbon+catalyst)(-1) at 0.1 mA cm(-2). The excellent performance of the F-PNG electrode is attributed to the good catalytic activity of uniformly distributed extremely small Fe/Fe3C particles and N-doped graphene, the high electronic conductivity, and the 3-D porous structure. These results indicate that F-PNG can be an excellent cathode material for Li-O-2 batteries, and MOFs-assisted synthesis method would be a promising new strategy for the synthesis of 3-D porous graphene materials. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据