4.7 Article

A simplified three-dimensional extension of Hoek-Brown strength criterion

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.10.004

关键词

Hoek-Brown (HB) strength criterion; Three-dimensional (3D) strength criterion; Intermediate principal stress; Failure envelope

资金

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi, China [2019SF-231, 2020SF-394]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [41630639]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study identifies the effect of sigma(2) on the strength of rocks through true triaxial tests and develops a simple 3D strength criterion. The modified criterion demonstrates a good fit to most rock types and performs better than other criteria in predicting rock strengths.
The Hoek-Brown (HB) strength criterion has been applied widely in a large number of projects around the world. However, this criterion ignores the intermediate principal stress sigma(2). Many evidences have demonstrated that the rock strength is dependent on sigma(2). Thus it is necessary to extend the HB criterion into a three-dimensional (3D) form. In this study, the effect of sigma(2) on the strength of rocks is identified by reviewing the true triaxial tests of various rock types reported in the literature. A simple 3D strength criterion is developed. The modified criterion is verified by the true triaxial tests of 13 rock types. The results indicate that the modified criterion can achieve a good fit to most of rock types. It can represent a series of criteria as b varies. For comparisons, several existing 3D versions of the HB criterion are selected to predict the strengths of these rock types. It is indicated that the proposed criterion works better than other criteria. A substantial relationship between parameter b and the unconfined compressive strength is established, which guarantees that the proposed criterion can still work well even in the absence of true triaxial test data. (C) 2021 Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据