4.5 Review

Porous Organic Polymers for Photocatalytic Carbon Dioxide Reduction

期刊

CHEMPHOTOCHEM
卷 5, 期 5, 页码 406-417

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cptc.202000298

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22075060, 21911530146]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB36000000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many porous organic polymers (POPs) with conjugated skeletons and large specific surface areas have been used as heterogeneous catalysts in the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Different catalytic systems have been developed, each with its own advantages and drawbacks, such as higher efficiency but lower durability in metal-loaded systems. The reduction of co-catalysts in POPs aims to achieve a more environmentally friendly CO2 photoreduction reaction.
Many porous organic polymers (POPs) possess excellent light absorption capacity and CO2 absorption performance owing to their conjugated skeletons and large specific surface area values. Some of these fascinating materials have inherent reaction sites for CO2 conversion and appropriate band structures to catalyze the CO2 reduction reaction. Therefore, these POPs have been used as heterogeneous catalysts in the photocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Among those POPs, four kinds of catalytic systems have been developed for realizing the CO2 photoreduction reaction: POPs loaded with noble metals, POPs loaded with non-noble metals, POPs combined with inorganic semiconductors, and metal-free POPs. Each of these catalytic systems has its own advantages and drawbacks. In general, the catalytic system of supported metals has higher catalytic efficiency but lower durability than metal-free POPs. It should be noted that in the process of catalyst development, the co-catalyst is gradually minimizing in POPs to achieve a more green CO2 photoreduction reaction. In this review, different types of POPs and the relationship between their structures and catalytic performance in the photocatalytic reduction of CO2 are summarized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据