4.6 Article

Predicting Vibrational Spectroscopy for Flexible Molecules and Molecules with Non-Idle Environments

期刊

ADVANCED THEORY AND SIMULATIONS
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adts.202000223

关键词

ab initio molecular dynamics; cluster weighting; infrared spectroscopy; vibrational circular dichroism

资金

  1. DFG [406232243]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates two possible ways to perform spectroscopy calculations in complex situations for vibrational spectra prediction. The results show that the cluster-weighted approach is inferior to simulations in terms of computational cost but still reaches very good results.
Flexible molecules and non-idle environments can present severe problems in the prediction of vibrational spectra. This work focuses on infrared and vibrational circular dichroism for which the latter is extremely sensitive to such complicated situations. Here two possible ways to perform spectroscopy calculations for such situations are investigated. The first approach is based on static quantum chemical calculations employing cluster-weighting. The second approach is rooted in ab initio molecular dynamics simulations using the time correlations approach. For the present example ((R)-butan-2-ol), excellent spectra from simulations are obtained for gas and bulk, when the former is averaged over trajectories with all possible starting conformers and these are scaled to match the experimental spectrum. The cluster-weighted approach is inferior to the simulations but still reaches very good results at much less computational cost. A simplified, but computationally less expensive simulation approach is considered by approximating the electric and magnetic moments, which are input quantities in the correlation function, by classical equations and different populations analysis for the required partial charges. The results are inferior to the full simulations but still give satisfying results at the advantage of being much faster to calculate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据