4.5 Article

Environmental Performance of Small-Scale Seawater Reverse Osmosis Plant for Rural Area Water Supply

期刊

MEMBRANES
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/membranes11010040

关键词

life cycle assessment (LCA); desalination; environmental impact; seawater reverse osmosis plant; water supply

资金

  1. Malaysia Ministry of Higher Education under the Translational Research Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the environmental impacts of the first seawater reverse osmosis plant installed in Malaysia, showing that global warming impact was the highest, mainly caused by the natural gas used for electricity generation during the RO process. Reducing electricity usage can effectively decrease the environmental impact.
Seawater desalination is an alternative technology to provide safe drinking water and to solve water issues in an area having low water quality and limited drinking water supply. Currently, reverse osmosis (RO) is commonly used in the desalination technology and experiencing significant growth. The aim of this study was to analyze the environmental impacts of the seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) plant installed in Kampung Pantai Senok, Kelantan, as this plant was the first installed in Malaysia. The software SimaPro 8.5 together with the ReCiPe 2016 database were used as tools to evaluate the life cycle assessment (LCA) of the SWRO plant. The results showed that the impact of global warming (3.90 kg CO2 eq/year) was the highest, followed by terrestrial ecotoxicity (1.62 kg 1,4-DCB/year) and fossil resource scarcity (1.29 kg oil eq/year). The impact of global warming was caused by the natural gas used to generate the electricity, mainly during the RO process. Reducing the environmental impact can be effectively achieved by decreasing the electricity usage for the seawater desalination process. As a suggestion, electricity generation can be overcome by using a high-flux membrane with other suitable renewable energy for the plant such as solar and wind energy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据