4.3 Article

Evaluation of Adherence and Persistence Differences Between Adalimumab Citrate-Free and Citrate Formulations for Patients with Immune-Mediated Diseases in the United States

期刊

RHEUMATOLOGY AND THERAPY
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 109-118

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40744-020-00256-x

关键词

Adalimumab; Adherence; Citrate; Citrate-free; Injection-site pain; Persistence

资金

  1. AbbVie Inc. - AbbVie

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated patient adherence and persistence with citrate-free adalimumab (ADA-CF) compared with citrate-containing adalimumab (ADA-C), and found that ADA-CF showed significantly improved rates of adherence and persistence, with higher rates of adherence and lower rates of discontinuation compared to ADA-C.
Introduction Our aim was to evaluate patient adherence and persistence with citrate-free adalimumab (ADA-CF), introduced in 2018 to reduce injection-site pain, compared with citrate-containing adalimumab (ADA-C). Methods This was a retrospective cohort study using a US claims database (IBM(R) MarketScan(R) Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Claims Database) from February 2018 to January 2020. Patients at least 18 years of age who were naive to adalimumab 6 months before the index date (date of first adalimumab claim) and with at least 12 months of continuous medical and pharmacy coverage were eligible for the study. Adherence was assessed by determining the proportion of days covered (PDC) and the percentage of patients with PDC >= 80% during the 12-month follow-up period. Persistence was evaluated by measuring the rate of discontinuation and days to discontinuation (i.e., time on treatment) from the index date over the 12-month follow-up period. Continuous adherence outcomes (PDC) were evaluated using linear regression models. Binary adherence outcomes (PDC >= 80%) were assessed using logistic regression models. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess persistence outcomes. Results There were 2195 and 1005 patients in the ADA-CF and ADA-C cohorts, respectively, with most using adalimumab for rheumatoid arthritis (ADA-CF 29.7%, ADA-C 27.2%) and psoriasis (ADA-CF 24.5%, ADA-C 31.9%). Significantly greater adherence was achieved with ADA-CF compared with ADA-C (mean PDC [standard deviation] 0.68 [0.30] vs 0.61 [0.32], P < 0.0001). A significantly greater percentage of patients receiving ADA-CF (47.2%) vs ADA-C (39.6%) had PDC >= 80% (P < 0.0001). The discontinuation rate was significantly lower for the ADA-CF cohort (46.4%) compared with ADA-C (55.9%, P < 0.0001), resulting in a 27% lower likelihood of discontinuation during the 12-month follow-up period (hazard ratio 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.66, 0.82; P < 0.0001) and longer time on treatment (260 vs 232 days, P < 0.0001). Conclusion Adherence and persistence are significantly improved with ADA-CF compared with ADA-C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据