4.7 Article

Long-term alterations of flow regimes of the Mekong River and adaptation strategies for the Vietnamese Mekong Delta

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100742

关键词

Hydropower dams; Flow regimes; Discharge; The Mekong; Vietnamese Mekong Delta (VMD); Salinity intrusion

资金

  1. Japan-ASEAN Science, Technology and Innovation Platform (JASTIP)
  2. Supporting Program for Interaction-Based Initiative Team Studies SPIRITS 2016 of Kyoto University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Study region: The Mekong basin, where climate change and anthropogenic interventions (e.g., dams, sand mining, and sluice gates) have intensified in the recent decades affecting the pristine flow regime and salinity intrusion. Study focus: This paper aims at quantifying the flow regime alterations in the entire Mekong from 1980 to 2015 and linking with the controlling drivers of alterations. In this regard, various indicators, analytical methods, and a semi two-dimensional hydrodynamic and advectiondispersion model were used. New hydrological insights for the region: The flow regime alterations in the high-dam development period (2009-2015) are more pronounced than in the low-dam development period (1993-2008), compared to the no-dam development period (1980-1992), based on most of the indicators analyzed. In the high-dam development period all existing dams with large reservoir capacity seemed to have cumulatively reduced the flood pulses and frequency and increased the low-flow discharge along the entire Mekong through reservoir operations, exceeding climate change effect. In the recent years the water levels in the low-flow season in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta (VMD) have decreased, possibly because of increased riverbed incision caused by reduced sediment supply and increased sand mining. The reduced water levels together with the increased number of the sluice gates constructed seemed to have increased salinity intrusion in the VMD which may be partly reduced by early emergency water release from upstream dams.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据