4.7 Article

Detonation spraying of Ti-Cu mixtures in different atmospheres: Carbon, nitrogen and oxygen uptake by the powders

期刊

SURFACES AND INTERFACES
卷 21, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2020.100676

关键词

Detonation spraying; Coating; Incomplete combustion; Carbon; Microstructure; Hardness

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [20-53-54001]
  2. Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology [20-53-54001, QTRU01.04/2020-2021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phase composition and microstructure of coatings formed by detonation spraying of Ti-Cu powder mixtures using C2H2 + kO(2) explosive charges with k varying from 0.7 to 2.0 were studied. The Ti-Cu system was selected to demonstrate the possibilities of forming metal matrix composites (MMCs) with in-situ synthesized ceramic particles during the coating deposition. The formation of composite microstructures needs to be considered when obtaining carbon-containing MMCs by detonation spraying using acetylene-oxygen mixtures at k < 1. The focus of the present study is the phase formation, microstructure development and hardness variation of the coatings caused by carbon, oxygen and nitrogen uptake by the Ti-Cu mixtures during spraying. Carbon released in the form of graphene nanoplatelets as a result of incomplete combustion of acetylene at k = 0.7 reacted with titanium, and, in the presence of nitrogen (a carrier gas), the TiCxNy phase formed in the coatings. Copper was found to play a protective role, reducing the conversion degree of titanium into the ceramic phases. Deposits containing 21 - 44 wt.% of ceramic components formed when an explosive charge equal to 50% of the gun barrel volume was used, the nature and concentration of the ceramic phases depending on k. At k = 2.0 and an explosive charge of 50%, a composite coating reinforced with Ti2O3, TiO and TiN (comprising 41 wt.% in total) was obtained. This composite showed a microhardness of 480 HV, which was due to a high content of ceramic phases synthesized in situ during spraying.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据