4.6 Article

An innovative picture fuzzy distance measure and novel multi-attribute decision-making method

期刊

COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS
卷 7, 期 2, 页码 781-805

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s40747-020-00235-3

关键词

Picture fuzzy set; Picture fuzzy distance measure; Pattern recognition; TOPSIS; Inferior ratio

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a novel picture fuzzy distance measure based on direct operations on membership functions, and discusses its advantages in pattern classification problems. Conversion formulae are derived to apply the proposed method in real data sets. Additionally, a new multi-attribute decision-making method using the proposed PF distance measure is introduced and its performance is compared with classical methods in a PF environment.
Picture fuzzy set (PFS) is a direct generalization of the fuzzy sets (FSs) and intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs). The concept of PFS is suitable to model the situations that involve more answers of the type yes, no, abstain, and refuse. In this study, we introduce a novel picture fuzzy (PF) distance measure on the basis of direct operation on the functions of membership, non-membership, neutrality, refusal, and the upper bound of the function of membership of two PFSs. We contrast the proposed PF distance measure with the existing PF distance measures and discuss the advantages in the pattern classification problems. The application of fuzzy and non-standard fuzzy models in the real data is very challenging as real data is always found in crisp form. Here, we also derive some conversion formulae to apply proposed method in the real data set. Moreover, we introduce a new multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) method using the proposed PF distance measure. In addition, we justify necessity of the newly proposed MADM method using appropriate counterintuitive examples. Finally, we contrast the performance of the proposed MADM method with the classical MADM methods in the PF environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据