4.7 Article

Coupling control on pillar stress concentration and surface cracks in shallow multi-seam mining

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.12.019

关键词

Shallow multi-seam; Coal pillar offset; Stress concentration; Surface cracks; Strata control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51674190, 52074211]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi [2019JQ-798, 2019JLP-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the impact of different coal pillar offset distances on stratum cracks and stress concentration in coal pillars, establishing a formula for safe mining. Through practical application, good results have been achieved in safe and environmentally friendly mining.
In order to ensure safe mining and reduce surface damage in shallow multi-seam mining, the failure characteristics of interburden strata with different coal pillars offset distances between pillars in the upper and lower seams, the distribution characteristics of stress concentration in coal pillars, and the development characteristics of stratum cracks and subsidence were investigated by physical and UDEC2D simulation. Meanwhile, the effect of different coal pillar offset distances on stress concentration of coal pillar and development of stratum cracks were studied. Based on those results, a formula for safe mining and reducing surface damage was established, which provided a theoretical basis for safe and environmentally friendly mining in shallow multi-seam. According to the results, the optimal coal pillar offset distance (the side to side horizontal distance of the upper and lower coal pillars) between the upper and lower coal seams was developed to reduce the stress concentration of coal pillars and surface damage. The results of this study have been applied in Ningtiaota coal mine and have achieved good results in safe and environmentally friendly mining. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of China University of Mining & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据