4.6 Article

Nitrogen and Oxygen-Doped Hierarchical Porous Carbons from Algae Biomass: Direct Carbonization and Excellent Electrochemical Properties

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 225-233

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.053

关键词

Hierarchical carbons; Algae biomass; Carbonization; Electrochemical properties; CO2 capture

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21506184]
  2. PhD Foundation of Xiangtan University [15QDZ13]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M572258]
  4. SWMES Key Lab Foundation of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University [SWMES201515]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy of Central South University
  6. Foundation of Environmental Protection Science and Technology of Hunan Province, China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, the algae pollutants of Enteromorpha prolifera were applied as precursors to obtain nitrogen and oxygen co-doped hierarchical carbons with major pores at around 1.5 and 5.0 nm through direct carbonization at 700 and 900 degrees C after freeze-drying treatment. Physical properties of porous carbons including morphology, elemental analysis, and pore size distribution were evaluate by transmission electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and N-2 sorption. In both cases, surface areas were only close to 450 m(2) g (1) with 70% areas inherited from mesopores, resulting in high density materials. The carbon derived at 700 degrees C had the highest capacitance of 234 F g (1) at a current density of 0.5 A g (1) in 6 M KOH electrolyte and also had excellent cycling stability with 95% of capacitance after 2000 cycles, owing to the naturally heteroatoms and unique hierarchical nanopores contributed pseudo-capacitance and provided active sites for facilitating electrolyte ions diffusion. In addition, the carbon derived at 900 degrees C had CO2 uptake of 6.48 mmol g (1) at 20 bar and 25 degrees C. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据