4.5 Review

COVID-19: Before the Fall, An Evidence-Based Narrative Review of Treatment Options

期刊

INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 93-113

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-021-00399-6

关键词

Coronavirus; COVID; COVID-19; Evidence; Narrative review; Pharmacologic; Review; Therapy; Treatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the main therapies utilized for COVID-19 and drugs under investigation, with dexamethasone being the only one showing a mortality benefit in randomized controlled trials. Overall, the summarized evidence for other therapies shows limited positive results, highlighting the importance of a broad summary of evidence for clinicians to make safer treatment decisions.
The 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has quickly become one of the most dire international pandemic crises since the 1918 Spanish flu. Evidence for COVID-19 pharmacological therapies has shown rapid growth and a diverse array of results, but an assessment of the value of each piece of evidence must be reinforced. This article aims to review utilized therapies, the evidence level supporting these therapies, as well as drugs under investigation for the treatment of COVID-19. Primary scrutinized therapies include antiviral regimens, such as remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, lopinavir/ritonavir, immunomodulating drugs, such as corticosteroids and interleukin (IL) inhibitors, and other therapies including convalescent plasma. Only one therapy, dexamethasone, has shown a mortality benefit in randomized controlled trials and summarized evidence for other therapies show limited positive results. Reviewing these therapies in a historical way shows how limited evidence can drive therapy decisions. A broad summary of available evidence can assist clinicians in a return to hierarchical assessments of evidence which can lead to safer patient outcomes, improved distribution of resources, and better targets for appropriate therapy decisions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据