4.6 Article

Solution-Processable Cathode Buffer Layer for High-Performance ITO/CuSCN-based Planar Heterojunction Perovskite Solar Cell

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 218, 期 -, 页码 263-270

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.138

关键词

Solution-processable; Cathode buffer layer; CuSCN anode buffer layer; Perovskite Solar Cell

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973 project) [2014CB643501]
  2. NSFC [91433117, 91333204, 21374124]
  3. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB12030200]
  4. Beijing National Laboratory of Molecular Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite solar cells (pero-SCs) have attracted tremendous attention recently because of their excellent photovoltaic performance. Simultaneously achieving high performance and long-term stability mainly relies on improving the quality of the perovskite film and overcoming the interface losses through interface engineering. Here, we demonstrate a high performance ITO/CuSCN-based planar heterojunction pero-SCs using solution-processable perylene-diimide derivative PDINO as cathode buffer layer. The device showed a high open-circuit voltage (V-oc) of 1.05 V, a hysteresis-free photovoltaic response and a maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 16.4%. The high performance can be ascribed to the proper choice of the anode and cathode interface materials. In comparison with the commonly used PEDOT:PSS anode buffer layer, the CuSCN anode buffer layer can increase the built-in potential and decrease the interfacial energy barrier with CH3NH3PbI3, which results in higher Voc. The thickness-insensitive PDINO cathode buffer layer is beneficial to higher short circuit current density. The results indicate that the combination of the CuSCN anode buffer layer and PDINO cathode buffer layer is an effective way to get high photovoltaic performance of the p-i-n planar pero-SCs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据