4.7 Review

High-Density Lipoprotein Modifications: A Pathological Consequence or Cause of Disease Progression?

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 8, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines8120549

关键词

high-density lipoproteins; inflammation; HDL modifications; dysfunctional HDL

资金

  1. Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research within the faculty of Medicine at the RWTH Aachen University
  2. DZHK (German Centre for Cardiovascular Research)
  3. NWO-ZonMw Veni [91619053]
  4. Else Kroner-Fresenius Stiftung [2018-A123]
  5. BMBF (German Ministry of Education and Research)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) is well-known for its cardioprotective effects, as it possesses anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidative, anti-thrombotic, and cytoprotective properties. Traditionally, studies and therapeutic approaches have focused on raising HDL cholesterol levels. Recently, it became evident that, not HDL cholesterol, but HDL composition and functionality, is probably a more fruitful target. In disorders, such as chronic kidney disease or cardiovascular diseases, it has been observed that HDL is modified and becomes dysfunctional. There are different modification that can occur, such as serum amyloid, an enrichment and oxidation, carbamylation, and glycation of key proteins. Additionally, the composition of HDL can be affected by changes to enzymes such as cholesterol ester transfer protein (CETP), lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT), and phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) or by modification to other important components. This review will highlight some main modifications to HDL and discuss whether these modifications are purely a consequential result of pathology or are actually involved in the pathology itself and have a causal role. Therefore, HDL composition may present a molecular target for the amelioration of certain diseases, but more information is needed to determine to what extent HDL modifications play a causal role in disease development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据