4.7 Article

Phase evolution in (1-x)(Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-xSrTiO3 solid solutions: A study focusing on dielectric and ferroelectric characteristics

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIOMICS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 677-691

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmat.2020.05.005

关键词

Phase diagram; Bismuth sodium titanate; Relaxor ferroelectric; Phase evolution; Strontium titanate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672226, 51772239]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (XJTU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, the nature of phase evolution of (1-x)(Na0.5Bi0. (5))TiO3-xSrTiO(3) (NBT-xST) solid solutions with x of 0-0.6 is revealed by characterizing the dielectric and ferroelectric properties. Two unique dielectric anomalies associated with high-temperature nanoregions (PNRs) in the ergodic relaxor (ER) state and low-temperature PNRs in the nonergodic relaxor (NR) state are identified. Characteristic temperatures, including T-B, T-RT*, T-m, T-d and T-T*, are determined in fresh and poled states on the basis of the characteristics of the evolution of these two dielectric anomalies. The whole evolution of the transition from the NR state to the ER state is reflected by the temperature-dependent polarization versus electric field (P-E) hysteresis loops, i.e., from the square loops, via the double-like loops, to the slim loops. The characteristic temperatures, including TP-N, TN-R and TR-dis, are determined by the characteristics of the evolution of P-E loops. Accordingly, a phase diagram of NBT-xST was constructed according to these characteristic temperatures. Most importantly, the relationship between polarization responses and heterogeneous polar phase coexistence has been established and a schematic diagram is given. This work will help to understand the phase evolution and its impact on the macroscopic properties of NBT and the associated NBT-based solid solutions. (C) 2020 The Chinese Ceramic Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据