4.8 Review

Ni-based layered double hydroxide catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100292

关键词

Layered double hydroxide; Oxygen evolution reaction; Electrocatalysts; Water splitting reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21603041, 21972124]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review comprehensively summarizes recent developments of Ni-based layered double hydroxides (LDHs) in oxygen evolution reaction (OER), including fabrication strategies, electrocatalyst applications, and structural modifications. It identifies obstacles hindering the practical use of Ni-based LDHs and emphasizes the need for more research in structural rational design and application in real water electrolysis techniques.
Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is a significant half-reaction in varied energy conversion devices. Ni-based layered double hydroxides (LDHs) have attracted immense attention recently for OER. Herein, we have provided a comprehensive overview of the recent development of the Ni-based LDHs for OER. We firstly introduced some fabrication strategies and in situ characterization followed by some typical Ni-based LDHs as electrocatalysts for OER. Then the structure modifications such as exfoliation, layer composition tuning, interlayer space adjustment and integrating Ni-based LDHs with complementing functional materials were overviewed. Some obstacles that hinder the practical applications of Ni-based LDHs were also discussed and it was pointed out that more efforts should be given to structure rational design and the catalyst application in the real water electrolysis technique. This review can help readers understand the recent development of the Ni-based LDHs and get some insights into the rational design of Ni-based LDHs catalyst and catalytic performance improvement strategy. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据