4.8 Article

Influence of land tenure interventions on human well-being and environmental outcomes

期刊

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
卷 4, 期 3, 页码 242-251

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-00648-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. David and Lucile Packard Foundation [2018-67261]
  2. CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions and Markets

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Land tenure security is increasingly recognized as a crucial element for advancing global sustainable development agendas. The majority of studies show that improved land tenure security has positive impacts on human well-being and environmental outcomes. More research is needed to understand the effects of non-technical interventions and rights devolution in informing future land policy efforts and accelerating sustainable development.
Land tenure security is increasingly recognized as a foundational element for advancing global sustainable development agendas, but questions remain about how it affects human well-being and environmental outcomes. We identify 117 studies that aimed to estimate the causal effect of land tenure security interventions on these outcomes. Approximately two-thirds of these studies reported positive links between improved tenure security and human well-being or environmental outcomes. Close to half of the studies that examined social and environmental outcomes reported positive impacts on both. The majority of studies assessed government-implemented interventions that statutorily recognized rights through land titling and formalization in the 1990s and 2000s. More research is needed to bolster the body of evidence on the effects of non-technical interventions (for example, capacity building and awareness raising) and the devolution of rights to inform future land policy efforts and accelerate sustainable development. A meta-analysis of 117 studies to determine the impacts of land tenure security on socio-environmental outcomes and sustainable development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据