4.8 Article

Rational design of carbon materials as anodes for potassium-ion batteries

期刊

ENERGY STORAGE MATERIALS
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 483-507

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2020.10.015

关键词

Potassium-ion batteries; Carbon materials; Potassium storage mechanism; Rational design

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51706114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the recent advances in rational design of carbon materials for developing anodes for potassium-ion batteries, including practical issues with various carbon materials as anodes, potassium storage mechanisms, and design methods for carbon materials. The ultimate goal is to develop next-generation carbon anodes with high energy density and excellent cycling stability.
The ever-increasing demand for clean energy has attracted considerable attention on the scalable and affordable potassium-ion batteries (PIBs) while one of the challenges hampering the development of rechargeable PIBs is attributed to the lack of suitable anode materials. This problem necessitates the design of cost-effective, nontoxic, and highly stable anodes with high specific capacity. In this review, we present the recent advances in rational design of carbon materials for developing such anodes for PIBs. Firstly, graphite, graphene, and disordered carbon as anodes for PIBs and their practical problems are comprehensively summarized based on sp(2) hybridization. Secondly, the potassium storage mechanism corresponding to the intercalation and adsorption mechanism for guiding rational design of carbon materials is discussed, followed by illustrations of how the design of heteroatom doping, porous structure, and carbon composites provides fundamental insights into high conductivity, structural integrity, and enhanced electrochemical activity. Finally, conclusions and perspectives are pointed out for developing the next-generation carbon anodes for PIBs with high energy density and excellent cycling stability.Y

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据