4.6 Article

Characterisation of a microwave induced plasma torch for glass surface modification

期刊

FRONTIERS OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 122-132

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11465-020-0603-5

关键词

microwave induced plasma; spectrum analysis; surface modification

资金

  1. Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Ultra Precision of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK [EP/I033491/1]
  2. Centre for Doctoral Training in Ultra Precision Engineering of the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK [EP/K503241/1]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [15/RP/B3208]
  4. Irish Research Council [CLNE/2018/1530]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51705462]
  6. ADTEC Plasma Technology
  7. ADTEC Europe

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the application of a coaxial electrode microwave induced plasma torch for glass surface modification, detailing the process improvements and experimental testing that resulted in the creation of a super-hydrophilic surface on glass.
Microwave induced plasma torches find wide applications in material and chemical analysis. Investigation of a coaxial electrode microwave induced plasma (CE-MIP) torch is conducted in this study, making it available for glass surface modification and polishing. A dedicated nozzle is designed to inject secondary gases into the main plasma jet. This study details the adaptation of a characterisation process for CE-MIP technology. Microwave spectrum analysis is used to create a polar plot of the microwave energy being emitted from the coaxial electrode, where the microwave energy couples with the gas to generate the plasma jet. Optical emission spectroscopy analysis is also employed to create spatial maps of the photonic intensity distribution within the plasma jet when different additional gases are injected into it. The CE-MIP torch is experimentally tested for surface energy modification on glass where it creates a super-hydrophilic surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据