4.4 Article

Effect of addition of beeswax based oleogel on 3D printing of potato starch-protein system

期刊

FOOD STRUCTURE-NETHERLANDS
卷 27, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foostr.2021.100176

关键词

3D printing; Oleogel; Starch-protein oleogel system; Print characteristics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Program of China [31872902]
  2. 111 Project [BP0719028]
  3. China State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology Innovation Project [SKLF-ZZA-201706]
  4. Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory Project of Advanced Food Manufacturing Equipment and Technology [FMZ202003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the 3D printing performance of composite mixtures of potato starch, whey protein, and oleogel. It explored the effects of different parameters on printing accuracy and found the optimal combination for the best printing effect. The results provide a reference for 3D printing high-oil systems.
3D printing technology has been widely used in the field of food. This paper studied the 3D printing performance of composite mixtures of potato starch, whey protein and oleogel. The hardness, thermal and rheological properties and crystal structure of oleogel were measured and the effects of the amount of oleogel added, printing temperature, printing speed and nozzle diameter on the printing accuracy were investigated. The microstructural study by inverted florescence microscopy showed that the crystallization of beeswax gradually increased as the beeswax content increased from 5% to 25 % in the oleogel. Oleogel was added into the starch-protein system (potato starch: whey protein: water 3:1:5) and 3D printing properties were studied. Through 3D printing, it was found that the oleogel content of 20 %, the printing temperature of 30 degrees C celcius, printing speed of 40 mm/s, and the nozzle diameter of 1.2 mm, were the best combined parameters for optimum printing effect. The results obtained in this study can provide a reference for 3D printing high-oil system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据