4.6 Article

Ultrathin carbon gauze for high-rate supercapacitor

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 990-998

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.067

关键词

ultrathin carbon gauze; Friedel-Crafts crosslinking; hierarchically porous structure; high-rate performance; supercapacitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502042, U1401246]
  2. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2015M572278, 2016T90770]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong Province of China [2014B010106005, 2015B010135011]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou City of China [201508030018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Further increasing the output power is important to develop next-generation supercapacitor. In recent years, many papers focus on the design of pore structure to improve high-rate performance of supercapacitor, but few reports devote attention to reducing the nanoscale size of carbon framework to reach an optimal ion transfer. In the present paper, a novel ultrathin carbon gauze was fabricated by a simple boiling-induced volume expansion method. This carbon gauze shows foam-like morphology that is composed of 7 nm-thick carbon sheets. In addition, owing to the loose stack of carbon sheets, lots of meso-/macropores are created. When used as electrode in supercapacitor, the ultrathin carbon sheets can effectively minimize the electrolyte transfer distance and meso-/macropores can accelerate ion transfer speed, and then carbon gauze exhibits an impressive high-rate supercapacitive performance. While the scan rate is raised from 0.02 to 0.5 V s (1), the capacitance only reduces from 190 to 173 F g (1), implying a retention of 91%, and even under an extremely high scan rate of 2.0 V s (1), the cyclic voltammogram of carbon gauze still presents a symmetrically rectangular shape, revealing a considerable capacitance of 142 F g (1) (75% of the capacitance at 0.02 V s (1)). (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据