4.6 Article

Reflux Condensation Mediated Deposition of Co3O4 Nanosheets and ZnFe2O4 Nanoflakes Electrodes for Flexible Asymmetric Supercapacitor

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 1604-1615

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.146

关键词

Reflux condensation mediated deposition; Co3O4 nanosheets; ZnFe2O4 nanoflakes; Asymmetric supercapacitor

资金

  1. UGC, New Delhi [41-249/2012 (SR), 41-370/2012 (SR)]
  2. UGC-SAP, RGSTC, BRNS, Mumbai
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C. [MOST 105-2119-M-011-002]
  4. DST-FIST, PURSE
  5. UGC-BSR Meritorious Students Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A facile, scalable, economic and binder free reflux condensation mediated deposition strategy is reported for the direct growth of cobalt oxide (Co3O4) nanosheets (positive electrode) and zinc ferrite (ZnFe2O4) nanoflakes (negative electrode) on a highly conducting flexible stainless steel mesh (SSM, 300 mesh) for the first time. Both the electrodes show supercapbattery properties. Individually, Co3O4 nanosheet electrode exhibits a maximum specific capacitance of 2083 F g(-1) (specific charge capacity 312 mAh g(-1)) at a high current density of 5 mA cm(-2) and also shows excellent cycle stability with 89% retention after 6000 cycles. On other hand, ZnFe2O4 nanoflakes electrode demonstrates a maximum specific capacitance of 923 F g(-1) (specific charge capacity 2100 mAh g(-1)) at 5 mA cm(-2) current density with 94% capacitance retention after 9000 cycles. The electrodes are used for fabricating flexible solid state asymmetric supercapacitor. Interestingly, the fabricated device exhibits higher cycle stability up to 12,000 cycles with only 2% loss in capacitance retention and delivers a maximum energy density of 36 Wh kg(-1) even at a high power density of 8.8 kW kg(-1). This work reports novel alternative synthetic strategy which could be extended to other metal oxides providing new scientific insights and avenues. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据