4.4 Article

Six months as a cutoff time point to define early recurrence after liver resection of hepatocellular carcinoma based on post-recurrence survival

期刊

UPDATES IN SURGERY
卷 73, 期 2, 页码 399-409

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00931-2

关键词

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Post-recurrence survival; Liver resection; Recurrence

类别

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung Medical Center, Taiwan [CMRPG8J1281]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In a retrospective study on patients who underwent liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, it was found that 6 months was identified as the optimal cutoff time point to differentiate early versus late recurrence. Early recurrence within 6 months was associated with worse post-recurrence survival and overall survival compared to late recurrence beyond 6 months.
To determine the optimal cutoff time point of early versus late recurrence relative to post-recurrence survival (PRS) among patients who underwent liver resection (LR) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a high-volume liver surgery center in East Asia. This was a retrospective study. Patients who underwent LR for HCC between 2011 and 2018 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital were enrolled. The optimal cutoff time point to differentiate early versus late recurrence was evaluated relative to PRS. Among 826 patients, 282 (34.1%) of the patients experienced recurrence, with a median time to recurrence of 12.2 months. 6 months was defined as the optimal cutoff time point based on sensitivity analyses relative to PRS. Ninety (31.9%) of the patients developed early recurrence within 6 months, and 192 patients (68.1%) developed late recurrence beyond 6 months. Early recurrence was associated with worse PRS (median PRS, 13.2 versus 48.9 months, p < 0.001), as well as overall survival (OS) (median OS, 16.2 versus 65.4 months, p < 0.001), than late recurrence. Six months was identified as the cutoff time point to differentiate early versus late recurrence among patients undergoing LR for HCC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据