4.6 Review

The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Pancreatic Disorders

期刊

DIAGNOSTICS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11010018

关键词

artificial intelligence; deep learning; pancreas; computer-aided diagnosis; machine learning; endoscopic ultrasound; pancreatic cancer; convolutional neural network; deep neural network; support vector machine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of artificial intelligence in medical imaging, especially in the analysis of endoscopic ultrasound images of the pancreas, has shown promising results. Deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis has proven to be effective in extracting information from the images efficiently. Further research and development in AI applications are expected to enhance diagnostic accuracy and education in EUS imaging.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in various medical imaging applications has expanded remarkably, and several reports have focused on endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) images of the pancreas. This review briefly summarizes each report in order to help endoscopists better understand and utilize the potential of this rapidly developing AI, after a description of the fundamentals of the AI involved, as is necessary for understanding each study. At first, conventional computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) was used, which extracts and selects features from imaging data using various methods and introduces them into machine learning algorithms as inputs. Deep learning-based CAD utilizing convolutional neural networks has been used; in these approaches, the images themselves are used as inputs, and more information can be analyzed in less time and with higher accuracy. In the field of EUS imaging, although AI is still in its infancy, further research and development of AI applications is expected to contribute to the role of optical biopsy as an alternative to EUS-guided tissue sampling while also improving diagnostic accuracy through double reading with humans and contributing to EUS education.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据