4.6 Article

Chemical intercalation of solvated sodium ions in graphite

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 222, 期 -, 页码 1365-1370

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.112

关键词

co-intercalation; graphite intercalation compounds; chemical sodiation; solvated

资金

  1. MOST of China [2015CB251100, 2016YFB0100400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to its similar electrochemistry to that of the lithium (Li)-ion battery but the high abundance of sodium (Na) in the earth, Na-ion battery is expected to be a promising alternative of the former, especially in stationary energy storage applications. Although it has been well-known that the Na-ions can be cointercalated in graphite in some ether-based electrolytes, a number of important questions related to the Na-ion intercalation remain unclear. In order to better understand the sodium intercalation in graphite, Na-ions were intercalated in highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) by immersing the latter in a sodium-biphenyl-monoglyme (Na-BP-DME) solution. The staging behavior that often occurs during Li-ion intercalation in graphite was observed in the Na-intercalated HOPG, on the basis of X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) characterization. The chemical formula of the DME-Na co-intercalated HOPG was determined to be Na(DME)(2)C-26 by a combination of Fourier-transformed infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy, thermogravimetry and the above structural characterizing techniques. The negligible impact of co-intercalation on the structural integrity of HOPG demonstrates that HOPG can be a promising anode material of the Na-ion batteries. The lower coordination number between the Na+ ions and DME and the interaction between DME and the graphite layers are believed to be responsible for the structural stability of the co-intercalated graphite. Finally the chemical stability of the ternary graphite intercalation compounds in air was evaluated. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据