4.5 Article

Modulation of Synaptic Plasticity by Vibratory Training in Young and Old Mice

期刊

BRAIN SCIENCES
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11010082

关键词

vibratory training; synaptic plasticity; hippocampus; aging; whole body vibration

资金

  1. Beyond Borders Project 2019 Tor Vergata University of Rome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that different vibration training protocols with varying frequencies and exposure times can modulate synaptic plasticity in the brain differently, with the best effects observed with low frequency vibration and longer recovery times. Future studies will aim to understand brain responses to various types of vibration training, explore underlying mechanisms, and evaluate potential structural and functional changes due to vibration training.
In the past 40 years, scientific research has shown how Whole Body Vibration concept represents a strong stimulus for the whole organism. Low (<30 Hz), medium (30-80 Hz), and high (>80 Hz) frequency vibrations can have both positive and negative effects, depending on the oscillation type and duration of exposure to which the body is subjected. However, very little is known about the effects of vibratory training on the brain. In this regard, we verified whether three vibratory training protocols, differing in terms of vibration frequency and exposure time to vibration, could modulate synaptic plasticity in an experimental mouse model, by extracellular recordings in vitro in hippocampal slices of mice of 4 and 24 months old. Our results showed that vibratory training can modulate synaptic plasticity differently, depending on the protocol used, and that the best effects are related to the training protocol characterized by a low vibration frequency and a longer recovery time. Future studies will aim to understand the brain responses to various types of vibratory training and to explore the underlying mechanisms, also evaluating the presence of any structural and functional changes due to vibratory training.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据